tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1320126156594375642.post4492126979395703342..comments2024-03-15T10:34:03.006-05:00Comments on LEICA Barnack Berek Blog: LEICA M (TYP 240) VS LEICA M9LEICA Barnack Berek Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09055435560407011075noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1320126156594375642.post-50128197217939909682015-03-12T12:48:30.728-05:002015-03-12T12:48:30.728-05:00I have been following Leica for a long time. I th...I have been following Leica for a long time. I think there are several explanations. One could be that many of the people who invested in the M9 are not ready or willing to move up to the M240. So they have to make themselves feel better by giving attributes to the M9 that don't exist. Another reason might be that there is a certain group of Leica followers who are rather conservative. To them the digital M9 is probably as far removed from the original M cameras as they want to go. This became apparent when the M240 was first introduced, when many of them rejected virtually all of the new features of the M240 as not necessary. So now they have to look for additional reasons why their choice of an M9 was the better one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1320126156594375642.post-11925772315068010132015-03-12T12:42:46.346-05:002015-03-12T12:42:46.346-05:00I wonder what causes such flawed thinking?I wonder what causes such flawed thinking?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1320126156594375642.post-28532338044939973172015-03-12T12:41:24.239-05:002015-03-12T12:41:24.239-05:00Ha! Thanks for posting. I have always thought th...Ha! Thanks for posting. I have always thought that the people, claiming the CCD sensor in the M9 was superior, were just fooling themselves. In reality, you cannot really tell if a photo was taken with one or the other camera. Thanks to David Farkas for setting the record straight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com