Tuesday, April 22, 2014

HOW TO TEST FOR PROPER FLASH SYNCHRONIZATION


To test if your camera synchs properly with a flash is no problem as long as you can open the camera back.  Looking at the frame opening of the camera while firing the flash at a bright surface, will quickly reveal if the entire frame is exposed correctly.  But what to do with cameras that don’t have an opening back like all of the Leica screw mount cameras?


There is a very simple, non-invasive way to do so.  All one needs is a piece of so-called glow-in-the-dark-tape.  This should be noticeably larger than the frame opening of the camera.  Inserting it into the camera in place of the film is all that’s necessary.  With the lens removed, if possible, connect the flash to the camera, set the required synch speed and set off the flash, preferably firing right into the camera and then remove the tape.  In a not too bright area, the tape will glow with the outline of the exposed area.  This will quickly reveal if the entire frame is illuminated or if the shutter is covering part of the negative area while the flash is firing.


This test will work with all types of flash equipment.  Especially with cameras like the Leica IIIf, which have a built-in flash synch adjustment, this test can quickly determine the proper synch settings without the need to hunt down an instruction book.



ANALOG PRINTS - A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO FIXING


As small as Leica is as a company when compared to the Canons and Nikons of the industry, they remain as a major player in the manufacture of 35mm film cameras.  Many loyal customers remain that have not totally succumbed to the siren song of digital photography and many of them still enjoy making their own prints in a good old fashioned darkroom instead of a digital printer. 

A very important part of analog photography is to properly fix out prints and enlargements.  Old photographic wisdom tells us that we have to use a two bath fixer to make black & white photographs last.  This is accompanied by lengthy washing to allow all traces of fixer to be removed.  While any of this does not present any nominal problems with resin coated papers, sufficient fixing and washing does become more problematic with fiber base papers.  Washing times of one or more hours are not unusual.  A lot of darkroom enthusiasts shy away from fiber base papers because of the lengthy developing process.  This brings up the request of viable alternatives.

In an article by Ralph Steiner, published by the Graphic Arts Research Center at RIT (Rochester Institute of Technology), he offered such an alternative.  This method was further researched, and verified by Ilford.

Both research papers suggest to replace standard fixers with fast working fixers like Kodak Rapid Fix.  Further more, it is suggested to use these fixers at film strength.  Mr. Steiner states that sufficient fixing is achieved within only thirty seconds.  This is then accompanied by a wash of only 5 to 10 minutes with fiber base papers.

After a five minute wash, a FASTFIX leaves one tenth as much hypo as does the standard Kodak fixing advise.  And a FASTFIX print which is washed five minutes has in it one fourth as much hypo as a LONGFIXED print which was washed thirty minutes.

Since film strength rapid fix achieves sufficient fixing in only 30 seconds, the paper is submerged only very briefly, leaving the fixer little time to soak into the fibers of the paper.  Subsequently, only a short wash time is necessary to remove these fixer traces from the paper.  Mr. Steiner writes:

Should you think to compensate for your LONGFIXING by LONGWASHING, just give up on that idea.  I tried washing a LONGFIXED print for two days!  In two days of washing I finally got a LONGFIXED print down to around the residual hypo of a FASTFIXED print which had twelve minutes washing.  Both washings were uncrowded and thorough.

The old order changeth, giving place to new.  Great and venerable Ansel’s advise to fix three times contains the virtue of thorough fixing, but we now know that the earth is not flat, and that a print is healthier and longer lived if fixed in pristine-fresh hypo – of double strength – the ammonia kind – for a breathless twenty or thirty seconds.

Sounds too good to be true?  Nearly everyone I know is skeptical of this method, especially for archival permanence of our papers, including myself.  Besides, do we really want to go against the advice of Ansel Adams?  Not that I doubt the methods described by Mr. Steiner and by Ilford.  But I do like to give myself a little bit more assurance.  I have modified the above method by fixing for 1 to 1½  minutes with film strength rapid fix.  After a short rinse in running water, the prints are soaked for at least three minutes in a hypo clearing solution and then washed for 30 minutes.  This has worked flawlessly for many years.


Recent research has also shown that small trace amounts of hypo will actually help to prevent the break down of the photographic image in the emulsion due to environmental influences.  This leads us to rethink methods of archival processing.  Total elimination of any traces of hypo has always seemed to be necessary for the archival permanence of our black & white photographs.  If indeed small trace amounts of residual hypo are beneficial, both of the above fixing and washing methods are perfectly viable.  However, considering the substantial reduction of time needed to arrive at a well fixed and well washed print, makes Mr. Steiner’s method a very valid alternative.



Wednesday, April 16, 2014

WALKING IN THE STEPS OF OSKAR BARNACK



Most Leica enthusiasts are familiar with the iconic photograph Oskar Barnack took of the Eisenmarkt in Wetzlar with the Ur-Leica in 1913.  Anyone who has ever been in Wetzlar will agree that the city has maintained its old character quite well and that nothing much has changed.  Yet if we compare pictures taken over the years, we will notice subtle changes that have indeed been made.

Here are three photographs of the same scene, taken from the same camera position.  The original by Oskar Barnack from 1913, one taken by W. Pringle Rodman in 1980 and one taken by me in 2007.  Mr. Rodman took along a copy of Barnack’s photograph in order to be able to duplicate it as close as possible.  My photograph was taken somply by memory.  It was originally taken in color, but I converted it to black and white to maintain the character of the other two pictures.

Eisenmarkt 1913 by Oskar Barnack

Eisenmarkt 1980 by W. Pringle Rodman

Eisenmarkt 2007 by Heinz Richter



For more pictures of and by Oskar Barnack go to:

THE UR-LEICA Part Two

LEICA, OSKAR BARNACK and the EARLY HISTORY OF PHOTOGRAPHY



Monday, April 14, 2014

PICTURES AT AN EXHIBITION



MUST ALL PHOTOGRAPHS HAVE A TITLE?


Over the course of a year, we have numerous opportunities to enter our photographs into a huge variety of photography competitions.  This includes Leica with the OSKAR BARNACK AWARD, for instance.  Many of the published pictures do have titles and some competitions make titles mandatory.  However, are titles really necessary?

In my opinion, this should be left to the photographer/artist.  Just as it is our choice to take our photographs the way we see the world around us, it should be up to us if we want to give our photographs a title or not, and we certainly should not be penalized for not having a title when entering a photograph into a competition.

Demanding a title can on occasion lead to some rather curious results.  I used to teach two professional photography courses at a private college here in Minneapolis.  To give my students a broader evaluation of their work, I routinely invited various photography associations and photography clubs to hold their competition judgments at the school.  In turn the students were allowed to enter the competitions even if they were not members of the association or club.

One photography association that regularly came to the school was the local chapter of the PPA (Professional Photographers of America).  They demanded that every photograph entered had to have a title, otherwise it would be rejected.

Most of my students as well as myself were never too fond of the local PPA.  It seemed that most of the photographs entered by their members were following the general ideas and tastes of the membership.  The similarities were often such that the pictures could have all been taken by the same photographer.

I always challenged my students to use their own ideas and to come up with something different because it would make their photographs stand out from the crowd.  I was often proven right with that approach because my students quite regularly walked away with the majority of winners, even though they competed against individuals that worked as experienced, professional photographers.

The absurdity of demanding titles was shown especially with one photograph.  It showed a variety of different size artist paint brushes, one of which had the tip of the brush coated with red paint.  Out of necessity, the student called it “A Dab of Red.”  The judges were quite impressed.  They gave it all kinds of accolades.  In fact, they saw nothing that required critiquing or suggestions for corrections.  A flawless photograph.  Yet at the end, the photograph was denied a first place finish.  The argument was that the title was incorrect.  We were told that “A Dab of Red” was misleading since the metal sleeve of one brush next to it showed a reflection of the brush and the red dab of paint.  Thus, they argued, there was more than one dab of red.

 

Frankly, to downgrade a photograph because the title is not quite right is about as myopic and pedantic as it can get.  Such thinking relegates the photograph to second place status behind the title.  It makes absolutely no sense.  Nobody at the school agreed with that decision.


Subsequently, when the time came again for the PPA to visit us, we decided on a little payback.  One of the students created a photograph of a campfire, showing a frying pan with a freshly caught fish in it.  As a title we chose “Der Fisch in der Bratpfanne auf dem Lagerfeuer” (The fish in the frying pan on the campfire).  When the photograph was shown it created quite a problem for the announcer to read the title.  But there couldn’t possibly be any argument about the accuracy of it.



Friday, April 11, 2014

BIGGEST FULL FRAME ENLARGEMENT



It appears that full frame cameras have reached a level of maximum pixel counts, or at least have considerably slowed in being offered with ever increasing resolution.  It used to be that the industry was doing a great job in convincing the general public that the higher the number of pixels, the better the camera.  This was definitely the case when we had to deal with 1 or 2 megapixel cameras.  But those days have definitely gone, and manufacturers have put more effort into improving sensors other than just increasing the number of pixels offered.  We now have cameras with incredible ISO sensitivities, low noise, great color accuracy, high res video capability etc.

So the question is, how big an enlargement one could one possibly make with a high quality, full frame sensor.  I researched the topic and wasn’t able to come up with anything definite.

Being that today’s full frame sensors use the same image dimension as 35mm film, I included 35mm in the equation. That doesn’t mean that we can simply equate a 35mm negative with files obtained from a full frame sensor, as a mater of fact, there are several factors that lead to a slight image degradation with film that do not exist with digital sensors.  Based on that, one can reasonable expect that a high quality full frame sensor can deliver a sharper image than a 35mm negative.

Ernst Haas image chosen for the Kodak Colorama

The biggest enlargement ever made of a 35mm photograph was the one for the Kodak Colorama at Grand Central Station in New York in 1977.  The original picture was taken by Ernst Haas with a Leicaflex SL and a 50mm Summicron-R lens on Kodachrome 25.  The finished Colorama consisted of 20 vertical panels of 3 feet width and 18 feet height for a total size of 18 x 60 feet This was the first time a 35mm picture had been used for this project.  It presents a 508 times enlargement to achieve the width of the image.  It was a definite testament of the quality of the film and that of the Leica camera and lens.

Based on modern sensor technology, we can reasonably expect enlargements of the Kodak Colorama size to be as good or better than what was done back in 1977.



Thursday, April 10, 2014

FUNNY MAIL RECEIVED BY LEICA



Over the years Leica has received some rather funny mail.  We are glad that some of these letters were saved because they definitely make for an interesting read and should bring some fun into your day.
Please Note: We checked very carefully; the typos are definitely not ours.

In no particular order…

“Please allow me to ask if it is possible fro you to send a 'Leica' for my disposal in trade for business.  I am offering the following: Insurance of all kind, private hospitalization insurance and Laundry Detergent.  In case you are interested in one or the other...”

“I have three magnifying glasses in average of 10cm diameter, and a close-up set of 5.5.5 and 5.5 cm diameter.  Are you able to make a binocular out of this?  I think it is best to reduce the size of the glass to that of a binocular or photo.  I assume you have binocular housings?”

“Both my Leica cameras were stolen, both cameras black in a briefcase with 1 pound of sausage, ¼ pound butter half a loaf of bread and Leica films (a lady in half figure pose with and without fur.  Lady appr. 50 years).”

“I wish for you to send me a Leisa camera.  If you don't have one in stock then don't send one.”

“I would like to throw a drop of water for hours onto a wall such that it will get a diameter of at least 1 meter...”

“I would like to check if I could buy a photograpfy apparatus.  I would really like to buy a photograpfy apparatus, I will send the money right away, then write to me how much the apparatus is.  One like on the picture that I enclosed.  But sometimes write to me if such an apparatus I can get, and how expensive it is, then I will send the money right away.  Now I must close with the hope that you will send me such a photogrpfy apparatus, I would really like that.  But please, write back to me at once, and send me such an apparatus I will send the money right away.”

A company wrote:
“We need a microscope, three or five barrel...”

A microscope delivered in East Africa proved to have something missing.  The letter requested the following:
“1.  Three lenses that you screw on...”
“2.  The lens through which you look on the top...”
“3.  The lens that is under the table.”

“Other than that the microscope is complete.”



Tuesday, April 1, 2014

SENSATIONAL AUTOFOCUS LEICA M-AF



April 1-2014


Leica M-AF with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M

This morning we received the sensational message that Leica will be introducing an autofocus version of the venerable Leica M, the Leica M-AF, and the amazing fact is that the camera will offer autofocus with any lens that can mounted on the camera.  No special autofocus lenses are necessary.  This was achieved by having the autofocus mechanism being part of the camera body rather than the lenses.  In simple terms, to focus, the lens mount moves back and forth within the camera body.  All that is necessary is to set the lenses to infinity.  This allows any lens to be focused from infinity to a certain minimum focusing distance, depending on the focal length.  This offers the additional advantage of achieving an autofocus close-up range by setting the lens to a closer than infinity focusing distance.  Here the camera will maintain autofocus, but at a closer range.

Leica M-AF without lens

Leica M-AF with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M at closest focusing distance

In order to assure proper alignment even with longer and heavier lenses, Leica decided to build the focusing movement in the same manner as the focusing helix in most manual focus lenses.  The threads of this mount assure proper alignment much better than any other method, like a sliding mount, for instance.  The internal ring section that moves the lens mount back and forth is geared and turned by a small but powerful motor.  This means that the actual speed of the focus movement is a bit slower than conventional autofocus systems, but that is a small price to pay for having the advantage that all lenses that can be attached to the camera, even those from other manufacturers, offer autofocus.

This approach does no longer allow for the rangefinder mechanism to work and it was necessary to remove the rangefinder. This allowed some of the electronics to be housed in top of the camera in the space taken up by the rangefinder in the other Leica M cameras.  For this reason, the viewfinder has remained basically unchanged, but the second rangefinder window in front of the camera has been removed. 

Close up of the focusing movement at closest focusing distance
The indent in the camera body for the lens release is clearly visible


This brings up the issue of the M-AF designation of the camera.  The M has always been short for Messucher, the German word for rangefinder.  But just like Leica doing away with the alpha numerical labeling of their cameras, no M10, just M, I guess we have to get used to the fact that Leica M now is the designation for all of their cameras of this particular body style.  This has been achieved in an almost perfect manner.  The new Leica M-AF is outwardly almost indistinguishable from the standard Leica M, Leica M Monochrom and Leica M-E as well as most of their predecessors.

Besides the missing small rangefinder window, the standard lens release knob had to be moved to be part of the focusing mount.  To accommodate it throughout the entire focusing range, a small indent in the camera housing will allow the lens mount to recede into the camera body when focused at infinity.

Leica M-AF with lens adapter R and 70-180mm f/2.8 Elmarit-R at closest focusding distance

Probably the most obvious difference in the appearance of the camera are two small buttons in front of the camera.  Pressing either one of them will disengage the autofocus system and allow motorized manual focusing by pressing the top button to have the focus mount move toward infinity and the bottom one for focusing closer.  This is done best with the auxiliary electronic viewfinder, the Visoflex Electronic.  Of course it is also possible to use the standard, manual focusing with the standard focusing mount of the lenses.  While this might sound as a duplication of manual focusing, we now have the possibility to focus manually with lenses that have no manual focusing possibility.


No estimates as to actual deliveries of the camera have been released at this time.



Friday, March 28, 2014

WHO REALLY MAKES LEICAS AND OTHER CAMERAS


 A different look at Leicas and other cameras from past to present.

Probably the best known name connected to the research of the evolution of man is Charles Darwin.  However, many people don't realize that his research involved a great omission.  Although he successfully discovered the basics of man's evolution, nowhere did he mention the evolution that took place with today's elves.  These peaceful and industrious  creatures must not be mistaken as gnomes, elves do not wear long, pointed hats.  They play an important role in the lives of many of us.  The users of Leicas and other cameras everywhere owe a great deal to these elves.

The great cultural centers of the European elves are the Black Forest, some parts of the Alps, the less harsh regions around Salzburg, and also the Harz mountains, the Erzgebirge in eastern Germany and the Riesengebirge on the boundary of Silesia and Bohemia.  Here they played an important role with the giant Rübezahl, but that is a different story.

Over time the typical habitat of the elves became smaller and smaller, primarily because of the advances of man and the advent of larger cities.  Consequently the elves found it necessary to change their lifestyles as well, many following man into the cities.  One of the earliest achievements between man and elf was reported from the city of Cologne where many elves helped a poor shoemaker succeed in his business.  Needless to say, the business of making shoes is not the only trade of the elves.  As a credit to their very small stature, they soon developed tremendous skills in the manufacture of fine mechanical things.  Today's finest clocks and chronometers are still largely made by elves.

Therefore it is no wonder that many found their way into the manufacture of cameras.  The Erzgebirge is not too far from the former German optical center in Jena and it was here that the first elf-made cameras became famous as, for instance the Zeiss Super Ikonta, the Contax and the Ermanox.  Unfortunately, the perils of time and politics brought an end to this center of optics and cameras.  But it was not too far from the Black Forest to the city of Wetzlar which was to become an integral place for the performance of the skilled elves.  Anybody who has ever visited this quaint little town, where time seems to have stood still for centuries, will quickly realize why these little people came and settled here.  We must remember that these unselfish creatures very much shy away from contact with man.  Some might say that this is just another example of their intelligence.

Wetzlar and the surrounding hills presented a perfect habitat for the elves.  They soon decided to help with the manufacture of microscopes at the Optical Institute.  This took place in approximately the middle of the 19th century.  Another new area for the elves was the Bavarian town of Oberkochen.  A lot of the former Jena elves decided to settle there when the Zeiss company decided to make Oberkochen their new headquarters after WWII.

After working on the Ermanox for a few years, it became obvious that a small, ready to use camera had a great future.  Several attempts were made by a number of manufacturers to use motion picture cameras for still photography, but it was not until 1913, when Oskar Barnack at Leitz made the first prototype of the Leica, that such a camera became a possibility.  Oskar Barnack has always been credited for inventing the Leica and along with it, practical 35mm photography.  But equal credit must be given to the elves.  It is interesting to note that some of the elves, who formerly worked in Jena, decided to visit Wetzlar upon the recommendation of some of their relatives who lived there.  Some decided to stay, and it is they who were instrumental in the development of the Leica prototype and with it the development of 35mm photography as we know it today.

It is not known if the basic idea for the camera came from Oskar Barnack or from the elves, but we do know that they were instrumental in the development of some of the features.  For instance, the prototype or Ur-Leica had an accessory shoe which was designed by one of the former Jena elves.  It is interesting to note that the dimensions of today’s accessory shoes and hot shoes on our cameras are identical to the one originally developed by the elves in Wetzlar.  The Ur-Leica initially had to be loaded in a darkroom.  It held enough film for 40 exposures.  After finishing the roll of film, the camera had to be unloaded again in the darkroom.  This, of course, proved to be very unhandy, and soon the elves designed a small, re-loadable, light-tight cassette to hold the film.  Since this cassette took up some of the space initially reserved for the film, the total length of the roll had to be shortened to 36 exposures.  That is the very reason why to this day 35mm cameras can hold (officially) no more than 36 frames.

Things were destined not to work as nicely as they could have.  War interrupted the beautiful conditions in Wetzlar.  Since elves have never made a gun or any other weapon, it is even sadder to see how they were influenced by something they had so little influence on.  The early post-war years were very hard.  This resulted in the decision of the elves to try their fortune elsewhere.  Thus it is not surprising that when Leitz Wetzlar decided to establish a North American branch in Midland, Ontario, some of the Wetzlar elves decided to go along.

Midland is a small town with surroundings very much to the liking of the elves, a perfect habitat.  The Midland elves soon felt very much at home.  They did not much care that their first working space had to be improvised in an ice skating rink.  They were finally able to do again what they did best – make cameras and lenses.  The operation grew and while Mr Kluck and his followers got most of the credit, it is no secret that without the tremendous skill and help of the elves, there would be none of those fine instruments for which the name Leitz and Leica has become known.  So even though the Midland products did not bear the insignia “Made in Germany” anymore, it was still the same elves who manufactured much of the goods.

A couple of them worked very closely with Dr. Walter Mandler and with their help, Midland soon became the center of optical design for the entire Leitz works.  The success of the Leica was assured and in the early seventies it became apparent that there was a need for expansion.  Once again, a small town with perfect living conditions for the elves was found, this time not far from the Portugese town of Porto.  Some of the older Wetzlar and Midland elves, now in their prime, decided to relocate in Porto.  After all, in one's older years, the milder climate in Portugal was something to consider.

With the help of the Wetzlar and Midland elves a marvelous new camera was developed, the Leica R3, entirely made in Portugal  Considering that most of these elves received their training in the mid-nineteenth century, it is much to their credit that they were able to make the transition to electronics.  Although Leitz has been criticized for making changes much too slowly, we must remember that with the average elf life span of 350 years, 10 years are but a moment in time.  According to human standards, elvers are definitely in no hurry, yet soon after the R3 we were presented with the R4, R5 and up to the R9.  The rangefinder cameras were further developed from the M3 to the M7 and then the digital M8 and M9 and now the incredible Leica M and Leica M Monochrom, along with a variety of other Leica digital camera and the Leica flagship, the marvelous Leica S.

For those who have doubts about the quality of the Canadian and Portuguese Leica equipment, remember that it is made by the same elves, or their descendants, who brought the name Leitz Wetzlar into such high esteem.  And let there be no doubt that the people at Leitz in Wetzlar and Solms are fully aware of the benefits they derive from those elves.  Why else would they have been so careful in the selection of new sites in Canada and Portugal?  They knew that by selecting such elf-friendly environments, the future participation of the elves in manufacturing Leica equipment would be assured and it is this that has and always will set Leicas apart from their competitors.

Legends say that the Wetzlar elves are descendants from an old Roman elf with the name Cameraus Automaticus, who is known for making some early experiments in the harnessing of light.  Unfortunately, traces to modern times are difficult to follow, since so many of his descendants went into different trades.  We do know however, that one of them, Cervesaus Delectibus, is known to have been instrumental in establishing the art of brewing beer in Germany.

But back to the manufacture of cameras.  It is no great secret that elves are a very proud people.  As soon as the Leica became a success, the elves in Jena decided to help in developing a 35mm camera for Zeiss as well.  The result is the now legendary Contax.

Unfortunately, we cannot show any photographs of the elves.  As we know from the experience of the shoemaker in Cologne, it is an unwritten rule that one must not watch or photograph them.  Heaven forbid!  This would result in their immediate departure.  So I hope that the readers of this article will understand that we can only show an artist’s conception of secret observations of what goes on at night in some of the camera manufacturing plants.

It was around the time of the introduction of the Contax that Eastman Kodak decided to buy the former Nagel Camera Works in Stuttgart.  Many elves had been working there for years, and they too helped in the development of yet another, the third ever, 35mm camera, the famous Kodak Retina.

Leica M5 Assembly

Transport of a FODIS Rangefinder in 1927

Working on the Optical Components of the Leica M Rangefinder

There are many other accounts of elves helping in the development of cameras.  Names like Exacta, Rollei, Hasselblad, Linhof, Plaubel, Sinar etc. come to mind, too numerous to mention in detail.  But one other success story must be mentioned.

In the early years after WWII, with Europe in ruins, some of the elves there got discouraged.  They thought it too difficult to rebuild and subsequently decided to try other regions, far away regions, which led many of them to Japan.  This, of course, also included some of the “camera elves.”

One of their early successes was the manufacture of lenses.  They helped the fledgling Nikon company, and it was due to the memory and the skills of some of the Wetzlar and Jena elves, that Nikon was able to make versions of lenses which were originally designed with the help of the elves for Leitz and Zeiss.  When Nikon decided to make cameras as well, it was again with the help of the elves that the original Nikon came to be.  The former Jena and Wetzlar elves decided to work together and to take the best of their previous masterpieces and combine them into a new camera.  The result was that the first Nikon essentially was a Contax camera body and lens mount but with the film transport and shutter system of the Leica.  Even the famous Nikon F was still based on that principle.

Another manufacturer, benefiting greatly from the help of the elves was Canon.  Their factory had mainly Wetzlar elves.  Therefore it should come as no surprise that the early Canon cameras were very much based on the Leica camera.

At this day and age all the various camera manufacturers of course have camera designs entirely their own. Tremendous advancements have taken place since the early days of making cameras, and unfortunately most of us give little thought and little credit where so much credit is due.  It is safe to say that even in these days of electronics and electronic controls, the top cameras in this world would hardly be possible without the help of the elves.  The developments of multi megapixel digital cameras would simply be impossible without them.  So let’s all be thankful that the experience with the shoemaker in Cologne a long time ago did not discourage the elves from working on our behalf.  Photography as we know it today would not have happened without them.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on ad to enlarge

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on ad to enlarge





Thursday, March 27, 2014

LEICA VS. YOUSUF KARSH



I have always been a great fan of Yousuf Karsh.  While some might argue about his work, his mastery of photographic techniques should be undisputed, especially when it comes to black and white.  The quality of his prints is amazing which, of course, is partially due to his use of large format camera equipment.

A while ago I decided to see how close in terms of sharpness, tonality and overall look I could come by using a Leica.  I chose my Leica M6 with a 135mm f/2.8 Elmarit.  As a film I used Agfapan APX 25 which I still consider one of the best 35mm black and white films ever to run through my camera.  While Kodak Technical Pan might have shown a bit higher resolution, I felt that the Agfapan was superior in terms of overall tonality.  The film was rated at ISO 25 and developed in Agfa Rodinal 1:100 for 16 minutes with continuous agitation.

The photograph was taken in an all white (walls, floor and ceiling) studio with Broncolor studio flash equipment.  Exposure was determined with a Gossen Lunapro F light meter in both incident and reflective mode.

The main rim light was done with an open, undiffused reflector positioned to the back of the subject, slightly to the left.  The light reading was via incident mode and the camera adjusted to render a +2 1/2 stop overexposure.  The fill light was a second light source with a large soft box positioned in the front to the left of the camera and carefully positioned to render the reflections off the skin.  Exposure was taken with a reflective spot reading directly off the skin and the output of the flash adjusted to render a -1 1/2 stop underexposure.

Even though the photograph was taken in an all white studio, the background was far enough back to have no effect on the exposure and thus turned out to be virtually black.


This photograph is a prime example why the ability to use a light meter correctly is very important, even with digital photography.  One might possibly be able to come up with a similar result just by using the instant feedback of a digital camera screen, but to do so is nothing more than photography by trial and error.  I prefer to use my camera equipment in a manner that predicts the outcome with the largest amount of certainty possible.


Did I come close to the excellence of a Karsh portrait?  You be the judge.



THOUGHTS OF PHOTOGRAPHY BEFORE LEICA




The following excerpt from the British Journal of Photography from 1890 shows how far reaching the introduction of the Leica was just a few years later.




WARNING:

“It is granted that hand cameras are indispensable for such as street views, or on the beach, or on shipboard, but they are decidedly out of place for use as picture producers.  Therefore let us oppose all attempts to popularize the use of hand cameras at our photographic outings, the high standard of pictorial excellence to which landscape photography has attained being in great danger of reduction by the use and abuse of hand cameras.”


R. P. Drage, British Journal of Photography, vol. 37, 1890; p. 565.



Tuesday, March 25, 2014

1981 "LEICA M6 ELECTRONIC" PROTOTYPE


I have been fascinated for many years by the history of the Leica.  Especially prototypes and test models which never reached the market are of great interest to me.  They give us some insight of what the people behind the camera have been thinking of, and what directions the further development of the camera might have taken.

Such a camera caught my eye just recently with the announcement of the special WestLicht auction in commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the Leica camera.  A photograph showing some of the rare Leica items that will be auctioned off showed a Leica rangefinder model unlike any I had ever seen.

The camera is shown on the right side of the picture below the microscope

A bit of research revealed that it is a prototype M6 with electronic shutter which ultimately was replaced by the M6 we know.  It was designed by Peter Loseries and produced in 1981.  The camera was based on the Leica R4 body.  The pentaprism and the mirror box were removed and replaced by the Leica M rangefinder.  It also included the angled rewind knob of the Leica M4.  The camera maintained the shutter of the R4 as well as most of the electronics.  This resulted in an M Leica with TTL metering and automatic exposure control.  This was achieved by placing the sensor of the light meter on an arm which would swing out of the way prior to making any exposure, reminiscent of the Leica M5.  The camera would also accept the data back and the motor drives of the R4.  The so-called “M6 electronic” was finished in late 1981 and only four complete prototypes were ever produced.

LEICA M6 with an electronic shutter, 1981 prototype

None of these remained at Leica and only two of them are known to exist. The M6 which finally went to production in 1984 was completely different from this first concept.

Along with the camera, Leica also made a prototype Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 with a built-in square lens hood, designed by Rolf Crema.  Only two of these lenses were ever assembled and it never went into production.

Overall, this hybrid LEICA camera has a mix of features of M6 and the R4 with an exterior that is more reminiscent of the M5.  Would it have been a sales success?  We will never know, but considering the resistance to the M5, we should not be surprised that Leica took a more conservative approach with the actual, marketed version of the M6.

Front view of LEICA M6 electronic with ELMARIT-M 1:2.8/28mm lens incoporrated with an electronic shutter, 1981 prototype model

LEICA M4-style design in a LEICA M6 Prototype camera, 1981

Emarit-M 1:2.8/28mm mounted on a LEICA M6 prototype camera in 1981

Base plate, LEICA M6 prototype body with electronic shutter, 1981


Special thanks to Peter Coeln of WestLicht for giving permission to use his photographs of the “M6 electronic” on these pages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on ad to enlarge

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on ad to enlarge

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography



Monday, March 24, 2014

100 YEARS OF LEICA PHOTOGRAPHY









CELEBRATE OUR CENTENARY WITH US

The year 1914 saw the birth of 35 mm Leica photography as we know it today. Oskar Barnack made the Leitz Camera, the very first Leica, 100 years ago. And now, in 2014, Leica Camera AG is celebrating the centenary year of this occasion with numerous events, exhibitions and exciting new products. The theme for this centennial celebration is 100 years of Leica photography'. Celebrate with us and look forward to many surprises that we will present to you regularly on our website.



CENTENNIAL PRODUCTS


On the occasion of this very special anniversary, 2014 will see not only numerous events, but also a series of centennial editions. Here are the first two editions. Keep a look out for more surprises.

Leica_S_Edition_100_1.jpg

LEICA S EDITION 100

The first of these special centennial editions is the Leica S 'Edition 100'. which comprises a Leica S medium-format system camera and two of the most popular S lenses, both with a central shutter, offering exceptional versatility in a wide range of situations - the Leica Summarit-S 70 mm f/2.5 ASPH. CS and the Leica Elmarit-S 30 mm f/2.8 ASPH. CS. The Leica S and both lenses are specially engraved with our centennial logo and presented in a bright aluminum protective case.

Details: http://us.leica-camera.com/news/100years_allproducts/jubilee_product_0/

Leica_D-Lux_6__Edition_100__1.jpg

LEICA D-LUX 6 EDITION 100

The second special edition of this centennial year, 2014, is the Leica D-Lux 6 Edition 100'. This centennial edition set includes a Leica D-Lux 6 compact camera in a two-colour finish with a silver lens and a high-gloss black camera body, featuring special engraving - the centennial logo - which appears on the front of the camera body. The camera is complemented by an elegant camera case in matching genuine black leather also bearing the centennial logo and a carrying strap and wrist strap to match.

Details: http://us.leica-camera.com/news/100years_allproducts/jubilee_product_1/



Sunday, March 23, 2014

LEICA DONATES CAMERA TO FUKUSHIMA SURVIVOR



Two Weeks ago Leica donated a Leica M Monochrome to a Japanese teenager whose family was displaced by the Fukushima disaster.  She had just graduated from high school where she was a member of the photography club.  She had planned to go to university, but her family’s problems prevented her from doing so.  Instead she took a manufacturing job to save up enough money to enable her to attend university after all and to continue with her chosen profession.

Leica chairman Andreas Kaufmann heard of her problems and decided to present her with a Leica M Monochrome camera to enable her to continue with photography.  At a press conference they presented the camera to the happy new owner. 


Immediately afterwards the internet was full of criticism about Leica’s donation of the camera to her.  Complaints went from criticism of the price of the camera, the fact that it is a black and white only camera and that Leica instead should have made a general donation to charity.  Leica made a philanthropic effort, besides all of the other donations they have made, to help a student to continue with her chosen profession, not Nikon, not Canon, not Fuji, not Sony, nobody but Leica.  Instead of heaping criticism onto Leica, criticism should have been directed to the other major camera manufacturers who chose to remain silent.

Had this been the only philanthropic donation that Leica made recently, the criticism would have been justified.  But the fact is that Leica has made substantial donations to a variety of causes.  So once again we have Leica being criticized for the sake of criticism, but ultimately without any justifiable cause.


What do you think?