Monday, December 22, 2025

PHOTOGRAPHY WITH AVAILABLE LIGHT


         

St. Paul, Minnesota Winter Carnival 1992 Ice Castle

Plaubel Makina, Anticomar 100mm f/2.9Agfacolor Optima 100, 10 sec, f/2.9

Digitized with Leica Digilux 2



By Heinz Richter

This terminology is self-explanatory; photography with whatever light is available.  During daylight hours, this is no problem.  Difficulties arise when light levels are quite low.  Under such circumstances faster lenses or higher ISO settings often become a necessity.  With film, higher ISO settings generally are accompanied with coarser grain and ISO 3200 is a limit that is hard to overcome.  Here digital technology offers considerable advantages with some cameras offering ISO levels many times higher.

This has created another performance evaluation besides camera resolution in megapixels.  Some individuals are definitely of the opinion that a camera isn’t worth considering unless it excels at super high ISO levels.  There is definitely an advantage to be had, but are levels of 10 thousand ISO or more really necessary or helpful for that matter?

I have been involved in several discussion about this and thus have come across examples where anything less than 10 thousand ISO just doesn’t cut it.  My enthusiasm of this is far more measured, but then I don’t photograph black cats in a coal mine very often.

"Boltergasse" Barntrup, Germany
Linhof Technica 70, Schneider Symmar 100mm f/5.6
Ilford FP-3 10 minute exposure
Digitized with Leica Digilux 2

Lou Bellami, Penumbra Theater, St. Paul, Minnesota
Leica M6, 135mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M
Ilford XP-2 Super, ISO 800

The beginning of my photographic education is solidly anchored in the film days.  Over the years I have certainly done my share of available light photography, yet rarely did that necessitate ISO levels higher than 800 or 1600.  As a matter of fact, I am hard pressed to imagine a photographic situation where anything substantially higher is necessary, although I should add that the coarse grain of very fast films is often used as an artistic element.

 
Children's Day Minneapolis Institute of Arts
Leica Digilux 2 
ISO 400, 1/20 sec, f/2.1

 
Newton Fork Ranch, Hill City, South Dakota
Leica Digilux 2
ISO 400, 1/15 sec, f/2.1

 
Lake City Marina, Lake Pepin, Minnesota
Leica M8, 15mm f.4.5 Voigtländer Super Wide Heliar
ISO 160, 1/362 sec f/8

Weilburg, Germany
Leica Digilux 2
ISO 400, 1/4 sec f/2.1

Marktplatz, Weilburg, Germany
Leica M240, 50mm f/2 Summicron
ISO 3200, 1/250 sec, f/2.8

Leica M5, 50mm Noctilux f/1
Kodachrome 25, f/1, 1/30 sec, f/1

I have always tried to keep film grain as small as possible which is the very reason why I used to shoot quite regularly with film speeds of ISO 25.  Obviously, that is quite limiting.  Combining small grain with a variety of film speeds led me to chromogenic films, mainly Ilford XP-2 and its successor, the XP-2 Super.  Unlike other black and white films, these have the advantage of offering a relatively wide range of ISO settings without the need of developing adjustments.  I regularly used the XP-2 and XP-2 Super at ISO ranges from 100 to 800.  This would be of no consequence if there were no apparent difference.  However, at lower sensitivity setting these films display a noticeably finer grain.  Since no development adjustments are necessary, there is the advantage of being able to change the film sensitivity as needed and take advantage of the finer grain at the lower speeds, all on the same roll of film.

 
Office Building Minneapolis, Minnesota
Leica Digilux 2 
ISO 100, 2 sec, f/11

 
Brentwood Estate, Alexandria, Minnesota
Leica Digilux 2
ISO 100, 8sec, f/2

 
Private Japanese Garden, Plymouth, Minnesota
Leica Digilux 2
ISO 100, 1/2 sec, f/2

 
"Tecco"
former principal violinist St. Paul Chamber Orchestra, St. Paul, Minnesota
Leica R4. 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit-R
Ilford XP-2 Super, ISO 800

Of course such considerations are of not much consequence with digital cameras.  Here we can change sensitivity setting at will, although the greater noise at relatively high settings, which does look very much like film grain, is something to consider.  Thus I still follow my old habit of using relatively low ISO settings in order to get the most out of my cameras and lenses.  With my digital cameras that generally is ISO 100 or 200.

Available light photography is considered by most as photography under relatively low light levels.  This naturally can result in fairly slow shutter speeds unless higher sensitivity settings are utilized.  Of course a tripod can be of great help when slow shutter speeds are necessary, although no tripod can overcome the need for faster shutter speeds with fast moving subjects.  I also consider a tripod very restrictive in the way I can use a camera.  I much prefer to use my cameras hand held.

 
Cindy Hillger, Don Shelby
Live Newscast WCCO TV Minneapolis, Minnesota
Leica M6, 50mm f/2 Summicron-M
Ilford XP-2 Super, ISO 800

Venice
Leica M8, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit
ISO 2500, 1/20 sec 

Venice
Leica M8, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit
ISO 1250, 1/15 sec 

Venice
Leica M8, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit
ISO 1250, 1/11sec 

For that reason I still employ the old formula that I learned in the film days, to use as the slowest shutter speed a setting which is the equivalent of the focal length of the lens.  With other words, the slowest shutter speed that the average person can safely hand hold with a 50mm lens is 1/50 (1/60) sec.  Subsequently, 1/250 sec would be the slowest with a 250mm lens, 1/30 sec with a 28mm etc.  This approach has served me well over the years.  Obviously there are times when this would lead to underexposure.  In those cases, bracing on a solid object will allow handholding the camera at lower shutter speeds.

Would higher ISO settings be of an advantage?  Of course!  As long as the image quality does not substantially deteriorate, why not?  But I would not make high ISO capabilities a major factor when deciding on a camera.  As long as my camera equipment offers good performance at ISO 1600 or 3200, I feel unrestricted.

Finally, I must comment on another advantage of digital cameras.  With relatively long exposure times, they don’t display reciprocity failure.  This is a definite problem with most films and, unfortunately, it differs from film to film.  As a rule of thumb, we can safely assume that reciprocity failure is of no consequence with exposure times up to one second.  After that the exposure response is not linear anymore and films require an increase in exposure.  Unfortunately, there is little choice than to consult the reciprocity information that should accompany the film.

 
Don Stolz
Old Log Theater, Excelsior, Minnesota
Leica M6, 50mm f/2 Summicron
Ilford XP-2 Super, ISO 800

Vilsheim, Germany
Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit
ISO 2000, 1/60 sec, f/4

Leica M2440, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit, 1/60 sec, f/5.6, ISO 3200, 50% Crop
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

Musée National de l'Automobile, Mulhouse, France
Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit, 1/60 sec. f/2.8,ISO 4000

Vilsheim, Germany 
Leica M240, 50mm f/2 Summicron, 1/45 sec, f/2, ISO 6400

Strasbourg, France 
Leica M240, 50mm f/2 Summicron, 1/30 sec, f/2, ISO 6400, 50% crop

Near Munich, Germany
Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec, f/9.5

All in all, photography in low light is no problem, as long as we take the necessary measures to overcome the problems associated with this.  Digital photography has the added advantage of allowing to experiment without adding to the cost of film and processing.  The results can be outstanding photographs, much beyond the usual daylight snapshots.


    For other articles on this blog please click on Blog Archive in the column to the right

To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.

All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.

_______________________________________________________________________

EDDYCAM - the first and only ergonomic elk-skin camera strap     
 www.eddycam.com        

      


Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography


Sunday, December 21, 2025

A MORE AFFORDABLE ENTRY INTO DIGITAL LEICA M CAMERAS


Shooting my Leica on the Kehlstein mountainin, Germany  
Photo: Marlies Amling

By Heinz Richter 


Time and time again I see people asking for recommendations for a more affordable model in the Leica M line of cameras for the simple reason that a new Leica M 11 simply is beyond what they can afford. This not only for new comers to the Leica system, but also from individuals that are ready to enter the realm of digital cameras.

Recommendations obviously differ, running the gambit from the Leica M8, Leica’s first digital M camera, to the Leica M10. Needless to say, any of these recommendations are inevitably based on personal opinion as well as experience.

I grew up initially with Leica screw mount cameras. It wasn’t until 1970 that I obtained my first Leica M camera, a Leica M3, and I progressed via M4s, the M5 to my last film Leica, the Leica M6.

Then, in 2004, I entered the digital market with a Leica Digilux 2. My first digital M camera was a Leica M8. I liked it, but never got quite used to the crop factor of the smaller sensor. (see: Why I Bypassed the Leica M9 When Upgrading from an M8)

My current M camera is a Leica M240. Of course, since then we have been presented with the Leica M10 line and the current Leica M11, all with a number of improvements over the M240.



But still, I consider the M240 one of the best buys of all the digital M Leicas. Their current price range runs from a low end of approximately $2500 to the other end of the price spectrum at $3500 to $4000. Definitely more affordable than the cost of a Leica M10 or M11.

Both the the M10-R and the M11 have a noticeably higher resolution with 41MP and 60Mp respectively. In comparison, the M240 offers “only” 24MP. Of course both the M10-P and the M11 will allow for bigger enlargements and tighter cropping.

For myself, I rarely make any enlargements beyond 14x21 inch, for which the resolution of the M240 is more than enough. No issue there. But I do use a lot of cropping. I use it to overcome the unavailability of any zoom lenses for the M line of cameras. That is unless you want to use a Leica R zoom or a zoom lens from an other manufacturer in conjunction with the available electronic viewfinder. This has resulted in a 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit being my go to lens. If I need the view of a 35mm, 50mm or even 90mm lens, I can crop without any greatly noticeable losses. Of course, in the final analysis, it is advisable to use the correct focal length for best results. In addition, the Photoshop plug in ‘Bridge’ allows to approximately double apparent resolution with the ‘Enhance’ feature. (see: Easily Double The Resolution Of Your Image Files)


Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

Same file, cropped, converted to black and white

Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmari

Same file, cropped

Leica M240, 50mm f/2 Summicron

Same file, cropped

Probably the biggest advantage of the M10-R and the M11 lies in the higher ISO capabilities. They are a maximum of ISO 50000 for both the M10-R and M11. In comparison, the maximum ISO of 6400 of the M240 is an almost three stop difference.

Many users claim that ISO 3500 is the limit for the M240. That is correct if you plan to use the image files without any post processing. I am very familiar with Photoshop and hardly ever arrive at a final image without utilizing Photoshop. With noise reduction in Bridge, I have quite successfully been able to take advantage of the ISO 6400 maximum setting.


Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit, ISO 3200

Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit, ISO 4000

Leica M240, 40mm f/2 Summicron ISO 6400

Leica M240, 28mm f/2.8, ISO 6400, 50% Crop

The Leica M240, however, does have advantages over its predecessors in terms of resolution and, to a lesser degree, in terms of maximum ISO as well as tonal range. I also consider the availability of an electronic viewfinder a definite advantage because it allows the use of lenses beyond 135mm and the ability to do close-up photography beyond the range of any rangefinder coupled lens.


Leica M240, 400mm f/2.8 Novoflex, Leica 2x Extender, Electronic Viewfinder

Leica M240, 400mm f/2.8 Novoflex, Leica 2x Extender, Electronic Viewfinder

Lenses

The camera is only a start. We will also need a lens. I am a strong proponent to use Leica lenses, for the simple fact that with few exceptions, you cannot do any better. However, just as with Leica cameras, we are looking at some of the most expensive lenses on the market.

The used market offers a lot of possibilities. If you buy from a reputable source and if the equipment is guaranteed, there should be no problems.

The aftermarket also offers some alternatives. Voigtländer has earned a reputation for offering quite a variety of lenses for Leica rangefinder cameras with very good performance at reasonable prices. Zeiss is another good choice, but here you are getting into a higher price range.

The Chinese market offers quite a number of lenses for the Leica rangefinder cameras. I cannot speak from personal experience since I have not owned any of them, however, the general evaluations are that they are fairly well performing lenses, especially considering the cost.

In the final analysis, both the M10-R and the M11 are able to outperform the M240, even the M10 can, but if cost is entered into the equation, the pendulum swings to the Leica M240.


More sample photographs:


28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

50mm f/2 Summicron

50mm f/2 Summicron

50mm f/2 Summicron

50mm f/2 Summicron

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit

90mm f/2.8 Elmarit 100% Crop

50mm f/2 Summicron

135mm f/2.8 Elmarit

28mm f/2.8 Elmarit


    For other articles on this blog please click on Blog Archive in the column to the right

To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.

All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.

_______________________________________________________________________

EDDYCAM - the first and only ergonomic elk-skin camera strap     
 www.eddycam.com        

      


Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography