Leica M240 with electronic Visflex and 200mm f/3.8 Novoflex
By Heinz Richter
Without question, the best lenses for a Leica are the Leica lenses. However, that can put a considerable strain on almost anybody’s photography budget. Fortunately, there are some alternatives. I am not talking about cheap lenses that happen to have a Leica mount or that can be adapted for use on a Leica. It simply makes no sense to spend the money on a Leica with all its performance potential and then discard it by using a sub par lens.
However, there are some very well performing lenses that do offer a valid alternative. One such lens is the 200mm f/3.8 Novoflex lens. Unfortunately it is out of production and would have to be obtained on the used equipment market. That makes it a very cost effective substitute.
Leica used to make the 400mm and 560mm Telyt. Both gained a very high recognition for their excellent performance. They were of a simple, 2 lens element achromatic design which also made them relatively light. Later Leica added the 800mm f/6.3 Telyt-S. It was of a similar design, but instead of the two cemented lens elements of the 400mm and 560mm lenses, the 800mm was of a cemented three element design.
Novoflex too offered a 400mm and a 600mm lens of the same design as the Leica lenses and they too proved to be excellent performers. These were augmented later with the 200mm f/3.8 lens. Like the 800mm Telyt, this Novoflex lens also consisted of a three element triplet.
Novoflex 200mm f/3.8 on Leica Digilux 3
The Leica M rangefinder cameras are best used with lenses up to 135mm. Everything beyond that used to require the Visoflex housing which essentially converted the camera to an SLR. That allowed the use of long lenses with no focusing problems.
Leica M5, Visoflex 3, Bellows 2, 560mm f/6.8 Telyt
But these systems were relatively bulky and somewhat awkward to use. To have the brightest possible viewfinder image, focusing in most cases was best done with the lens wide open. That, however, eliminated the use of smaller apertures when needed unless one was willing to accept the darker viewfinder image when using smaller apertures.
This problem was finally solved with the introduction of the Leica M 240 and the subsequent follow up models. For these cameras an electronic viewfinder, the electronic Visoflex is available.
Not only is it a lot smaller and a lot easier to use, it also adjusts the viewfinder brightness automatically. With the lens stopped down, there is hardly any discernible dimming of the viewfinder image.
That has greatly extended the usable range of these Leica cameras to long lenses but also any closeup photography.
Since none of the Leica rangefinder cameras offer autofocus, the ease and speed of focusing is very important. All the longer Leica lenses have conventional focusing mounts. But with the 400mm and longer lenses this would have been difficult at best. For that reason the 400mm and 560mm Telyt lenses used a sliding focusing mount, often referred to as “trombone” focusing, and the 800mm Telyt-S used a focusing knob.
Novoflex used a different approach. All of the long lenses featured a built-in, spring loaded pistol grip which, when squeezed, would focus the lens to infinity while releasing it would focus the lens to its closed focusing point.
That proved to be very successful and until autofocus became available, the Novoflex lenses were considered by many as the fastest focusing long lenses.
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 3200, 1/45 sec, f/3.8, handheld
I have both the 200mm and 400mm Novoflex lenses. Since I don’t do a lot of long lens work, the Novoflex lenses were a less expensive alternative without having to sacrifice performance. In addition, I found the Novoflox Follow Focus system so easy to use that especially the 200mm can easily be used handheld without any major draw backs. Before 'graduating' to the Leica M240, I used both Novoflex lenses quite successfully on a Leica Digilux 3 where the crop factor of the smaller sensor effectively doubles the focal length.
Since I don't use very long lenses very much, I found the 400mm relatively cumbersome to use and I began to look for a better solution. I bought a Leitz 2X extender which converts the 200mm Novoflex to a 400mm focal length with the advantage that I have a substantially smaller piece of equipment. Of course it slows the lens to a maximum effective aperture of f/7.6. I don't consider that much of a handicap since the high ISO capabilities of my camera are more than adequate for my use.
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, Leica 2X extender, ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec, f/8, tripod
Same file, cropped
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, Leica 2X extender, ISO 2000, 1/180 sec, f/8, tripod
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 800, 1/350 sec, f/8, handheld
Slightly cropped
Cropped detail of the same file
Cropped detail of the same file
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 800, 1/1000 sec, f/8, handheld
Cropped detail of the same file
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 1600, 1/2000 sec f/8, handheld
Note the virtually total abscense of flare
Cropped detail of the same file
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 1600, 1/1000 sec, f/8, handheld
Cropped detail of the same file
Leica M240, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 800, 1/500 sec, f/8, handheld
Cropped detail of the same file
The general opinion is that Leica M cameras are unsuited for sports photography. I would probably use a Leica SL or SL2 if I was doing a lot of that type of photography, however, for the occasional use, my Leica M240 with the Visoflex works quite well.
Leica M240, 200mm f/3.8 Novoflex, Leica 2x extender, ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec, handheld
Leica M240, 200mm f/3.8 Novoflex, Leica 2x extender, ISO 3200, 1/500 sec, handheld
To paraphrase Johannes Mario Simmel, “Es muss nicht immer Leica sein” (it doesn’t always need to be Leica)
More sample shots:
Leica Digilux 3, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 400, 1/800 sec, f/8, handheld
Leica Digilux 3, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO200, 1/500 sec, f/8, handheld
Leica Digilux 3, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 200, 1/320 sec, f/8, tripod
Leica Digilux 3, Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, ISO 800, 1/640 sec, f/3.8, tripod
For other articles on this blog please click on Blog Archive in the column to the right
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
_______________________________________________________________________
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
_______________________________________________________________________
Buy vintage Leica cameras from America's premier Leica specialist
Buy vintage Leica cameras from
America's premier Leica specialist
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
Click on image to enlarge
When using the a 200 mm lens on a Digilux 3, is't that a full frame equivalent of a 400 mm lens?
ReplyDeleteThat is correct. But you are still using a 200mm lens. It remains just as easy to handhold as on a full frame camera.
DeleteIn the 19th picture from the top, the horizontal wires appear to be somewhat out of focus. Why?
ReplyDeleteThey were substantially closer than the tower and out of the range of the depth of field.
DeleteIt is amazing that the cropped example is able to show the thin wires. How far away was the tower?
DeleteThe tower was about 5 to 7 miles away
DeleteI am surprised to see the rather good performance of the Digilux 3 with its rather small sensor.
ReplyDeleteThe Digilux 3 was actually a very nice camera, but overall it obviously can't compete with a full frame camera. Depending on the work the camera is supposed to do, it is a lot more important to have the lenses necessary to do the work properly without the need for any great amount of cropping. Therein lies a huge advantage of a high resolution, full frame camera. The cropped examples taken with the M240 clearly show that.
DeleteThe cropped examples are amazing. You can't tell that they are only a small portion of the total image. It is especially amazing to see that the shots taken with the 2x extender appear to suffer no losses at all
ReplyDeleteCouldn't you use the screen in back of the camera instead of the electronic finder?
ReplyDeleteYou could, but the focusing with the Visoflex is substantially more accurate since you are looking at a magnified image.
DeleteThe first picture with the runners appears to be soft. Is there a fall off with the lens when used wide open?
ReplyDeleteThe loss of performance with the lens wide open are quite minimal. The reason for the slight softness is due to the fact that I had to use a 1/45 sec handheld with a moving main subject. The rule of thumb here is a minimum shutter speed of 1/200 sec to successfully handhold the camera.
DeleteYou mentioned that the M240 has the advantage of the ability to use higher ISO settings without any great losses. Wouldn't that have been preferable?
DeleteThe M240 works quite well with ISO 3200. Beyond that incresed noise becomes more visible. While it is possible to use noise reduction in post processing, it is ultimately a judegement call. I have used the M240 at ISO 6400 and even higher quite successfully, but it does require more post production work.
DeleteWhy didn't you use a tripod for all of the shots?
ReplyDeleteI find lugging around a tripod very cumbersome. For that reason I shoot handheld whenever possible. Subsequently most of the sample photographs are a good representation of what one can expect under real world shooting conditions. However, to give a better impression of the lens performance with the 2X extender, I did use a tripod, unless marked otherwise, to avoid any losses to to camera movement.
DeleteThese are great examples of the advantage of using a 2x extender to keep equipment size manageable.
ReplyDelete