Wednesday, November 13, 2019

FALSE CLAIMS BY LEICA COMPETITORS


While looking at cameras on the web, I came across a blatantly false claim by Sony.  They wrote about the Sony Alpha SLT cameras:

"This changes everything.
Shoot with unprecedented speed and precision thanks to Sony's revolutionary Translucent Mirror Technology™. While traditional DSLRs depend on a reflex mirror to flip up and down with every shot, Sony's award-winning technology changes all that with its fixed-position, translucent mirror design…"

 
The Sony SLT mirror

That statement is definitely false.  The first camera incorporating such a design was the Canon Pellix.  The Pellix was first marketed in 1965. It was Canon's first 35mm Focal-Plane Shutter SLR Camera with TTL metering.  It was also the first commercial production SLR that incorporated a fixed pellicle mirror. It employed a super-thin, semi-transparent film only 20/1000 mm thick that was used as a fixed mirror.

 

The Leica connection to all of this is the fact that the Leica Visofelx III was also available with a pellicle mirror.  This was a special modification by Norman Goldberg.  Goldberg is perhaps best known, in the Leica world, as the creator of the Camcraft N-5 electric motor drive for the Leica M2 and MP. However, also to his credit were several other inventions for Leicas and other cameras. The clip he designed to permit wearing an M Leica on the belt was widely used.  He also offered a modification of the Visoflex reflex housing, involving either a beam splitter or a pellicle mirror. These too preceded Sony for a long time.

 
Leica camera with pellicle mirror Visoflex and Camcraft N-5 electric motor.
Please note the missing release lever and mirror action adjustment knob on the right side of the Visoflex

Pellicle mirrors never reached any nominal success; the main reason being that part of the incoming light is permanently diverted to the viewfinder, or in the Sony SLT cameras where part of the light is reflected to the phase detection autofocus system.  This effectively lowers the speed of the lens in use.  In addition, these mirrors are quite delicate and very difficult to clean.  Cleaning, on the other hand, is important because any dust, smudges or other dirt would adversely affect image quality since the mirror is in the light path from the lens to the film or sensor.

In view of this it seems strange that Sony would even market a camera of this type and it is equally strange that they have to accompany it with obviously false claims.

Another false claim by Sony was the announcement that “Sony did it: A7 and A7r are the first modern full frame mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras.”

Sony a7r full frame mirrorless cameras

That claim totally ignores the Leica M line of cameras.  Just like the Sony A7 and A7r, the Leica M cameras are full frame cameras with interchangeable lenses, and a whole load of additional features that Sony cannot match.  The fact that the Leica M cameras have been on the market a lot longer than anything from Sony apparently did not prevent the above claim.  One might argue that the Leica M cameras are rangefinder cameras, after all, that is what they are generally referred to.  However, the newly formed terminology of mirrorless cameras refers to the fact that the camera does not use a conventional SLR viewfinder.  Leica M cameras do match that criterion.  

 
Leica M (240) with Leica Vario-Elmarit-R 70-180 f/2.8

 
Leica M (240) with Summilux-M 50mm f/1.4

 
Leica M (240) with Vario-Elmarit-R 28-90 f/2.8-4.5

 
Leica M (240) with Canon lens

These certainly are not the only times camera companies have made obviously false statements.  A few years ago Pentax claimed that their 50mm f/1.2 lens was the first production lens with an aperture of 1.2, conveniently ignoring the fact that Leica introduced the 50mm f/1.2 Noctilux many years before in 1966.

 smc_Pentax-A_50mm_F1_2.jpg  

Leica 50mm f/1.2 Nictilux, first introduced in 1966

A short while ago I read a report that Canon applied for a patent for a lens with a lens mount on both ends.  It was heralded as something entirely new, previously only available with the help of lens reversing adapters. However, at the Photokina in 1966 Rollei introduced the Rolleifelx SL66 which had that very feature.  The front of the lens had a Rolleiflex SL66 lens mount which allowed the lens to be mounted in a reversed position without the need of any accessories.  Canon is just 50+ years late.  While this particular example has no direct connection to Leica, it is another example where facts sometimes become secondary.


Rolleiflex SL66 with lens in reversed position




_____________________________________________________________________

http://www.reddotcameras.co.uk/


                                   


      www.eddycam.com   

      


Buy vintage Leica cameras from 
America's premier Leica specialist 

                          
           http://www.tamarkinauctions.com/               http://www.tamarkin.com/leicagallery/upcoming-show



Click on image to enlarge

Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography

Click on image to enlarge
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography




11 comments:

  1. But the Leica M cameras are rangefinder cameras, M as in Messsucher, German for rangefinder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Leica M cameras have a rangefinder and have been referred to as rangefinder cameras for years. The terminology of mirrorless camera appeared a lot later, however, the definition of a mirrorless camera applies to the Leica M cameras as well. They are indeed mirrorless cameras which also happen to have a rangefinder.

      Delete
  2. Mirrorless cameras do have an electronic viewfinder, the Leicas do not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While that is correct for older models, both the Leica M240 and the Leica M10 series camerasdo offer an electronic viewfinder as an accessory. That has the advantage of not having the extra bulk of the electronic finder when it is not needed.

      Delete
    2. The rangefinder in the Leica does have mirrors, so it is not mirrorless.

      Delete
    3. So does the Sony. Besides, the terminology of mirrorless is referring to the fact that the camera does not use a conventional SLR viewfinder. It does not mean that the camera is devoid of any mirrors.

      Delete
  3. You quoted Sony as saying "..While traditional DSLRs depend on a reflex mirror to flip up and down with every shot, Sony's award-winning technology changes all that.." ..and note that Sony says "DSLRs" ..that's DIGITAL SLRs.

    The Canon Pellix - and Canon's later EOS autofocus RT - were not DIGITAL SLRs, but both of them use(d) film.

    So Sony's statement is definitely not false. I think you've got a bit carried away, and not noticed the mention of Digital SLRs!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I fail to see the difference. Both cameras are SLR designs. The D in DSLR simply refers to the fact that the camera uses a digital sensor instead of film. As far as the viewfinder is concerned, they are the same. Subsequently claiming a pellicle mirror as part of the viewfinder to be some new development is false.

      Delete
  4. Dont forget the Eos 630 R (not entirely sure about the number)
    It was a fixed mirror high speed sports camera with permanent viewfinder image and taking pictures at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I do remember that camera. Just another example of Sony being way off base with their claim regarding pellicle mirrors in cameras.

      Delete