If it were possible to make a
perfect lens, one without any flaws, this article would be meaningless. However, it is impossible to do so. Each lens will display certain faults which
are virtually impossible to overcome and, unfortunately, of these faults or
aberrations there are many and all of them will cause the photographic image to
deteriorate. It is not my intention to
go into the problems of lens design as such; instead I want to talk about what
can be done to keep aberrations to a minimum, to make a lens sharper.
The easy answer is obvious;
keep aberrations to a minimum, eliminate them as much as possible. Every lens designer and manufacturer does
this, within the parameters given to them.
The answer is actually quite
easy, but very difficult to realize. The
key word is tolerances or precision. The
more precise a lens is designed and made, the closer it comes to an ideal,
flawless lens, the better the lens will perform.
During my visit to Leica I
was able to obtain a wealth of information about what they are doing to make
lenses as good as possible. That amounts
to tolerances and a level of precision simply not available from other
manufacturers. This takes place on two levels, the mechanical and optical
precision. For reasons of greater accuracy, Leica does no utilize any assembly lines. Instead, all production and assembly steps are done on individual work stations, usually in clean rooms with the work station functioning by design as additional clean environments.
The mechanical tolerances
applied by Leica must conform to a minimum of 1/100 mm or 10 micrometers which equals
less than 0.0004 inch for the accuracy of the lens mounts of both cameras and
lenses, but also for the accuracy of the focusing mount of their lenses and for
the rangefinder in the Leica M-type cameras. Other manufacturers apply tolerance of about
half of these measurements. The reason
for this is that the performance of several Leica lenses would be compromised
if these tolerances would not be adhered to. For the focusing mounts of all manual lenses, initial testing is done with a machine. But the final test is up to an experienced individual who is trained to feel even the slightest imperfections in the smooth operation of the mount. No machine is capable of doing that.
Work on lens and focusing mounts being performed
Adjustments for focusing mount being performed
The optical tolerances of
Leica lenses go far beyond this. This
starts with the various types of glass being used to make a lens. Leica used to make their optical glass in
house, but that proved to be too expensive in more recent years. Instead Leica now purchases their glass from companies
like Schott and Hoya. This includes proprietary
designs like the so-called Apo glass which was first developed by Leica for the
50mm f/1 Noctilux.
This Leica 900403 glass consists
of no fewer than a dozen different ingredients, including the rare earth
element lanthanum. One kilogram of this
glass costs almost 60 times as much as a common optical glass such as BK7. Please keep in mind that this APO glass is
twice as heavy as BK7. Subsequently the
volume of glass in a kilogram that can be turned into lens elements is only
half as great, making the actual price ratio between these two optical glasses
approximately 120-to-1
In many cases the factory
receives the glass as pressings which roughly approximate the final shape of
the lens. Other glasses can only be
obtained in blocks which must be sliced into sheets, cut into squares, cemented
together and ground to from a stack of discs.
These work pieces are then cemented onto the appropriate grinding and
polishing heads. About 100,000 of these
grinding heads must be on hand. Until a
few years ago, the grinding heads were made large enough to grind several lens
elements simultaneously. However, for
reasons of greater precision, Leica grinds each lens element individually in
modern machines which, in most cases, keep the glass stationary while the
grinding head rotates. Each grinding
step is immediately accompanied by a check for proper tolerances before the
element is passed on to the next step.
Tolerances differ substantially
already with the raw glass. Leica
applies a standard of ±0.0002% for the accuracy of the refractive index. This compares to the international standard
of ±0.001% as applied by other lens manufacturers. The accuracy of the Abbe number, the measure
for dispersion, is ±0.2% for Leica compared to ±0.8% internationally.
Once the raw glass blanks
have been received and tested for the proper accuracy of their properties, they
are ground to their specified shapes. For
the manufacture of individual lens elements Leica allows production tolerance
of no more than ¼ lambda or ¼ of the average wavelength of light which
corresponds to approximately 500 nanometer or 0.0005mm for the accuracy of the
lens surface. In comparison, the
tolerances applied by other lens manufacturers are ½ lambda or 0.001mm. Similar tolerances are used for the thickness
of the elements and proper centering along the optical axis.
As of late many manufacturers
are offering lenses with aspherical surfaces which can greatly improve lens
performance by virtually eliminating spherical aberration. However, there are two distinctively different
approaches in the manufacture of these elements. An inexpensive method is to produce a
“conventional” spherical element and sandwich it with a thin aspherical surface
element. These are made of precision
molded acrylic. However, this method,
originally developed by Zeiss, was ultimately discarded by them because it
could not approach their quality standards.
The main cause was the fact that even the clearest plastics, like
acrylics, consist of very large molecules.
Light, when transmitting, literally will scatter off these molecules,
causing the light to be diffused, which ultimately has adverse effects on lens
performance. Other companies use
precision molding equipment where a glass blank is reheated until it becomes
pliable and then is precision molded into the final shape of the lens
element. Some exotic types of glasses
cannot be used with this method because the reheating and molding will cause
the glass to deteriorate and thus make it useless. The same applies to lens elements of larger
diameters. Leica uses an entirely
different approach. They use computer
controlled automatic grinding and polishing of the glass elements which require
the adherence to extremely tight tolerances. Unfortunately such production methods can only
be achieved at considerable expense.
Measurement for accurate thickness of the lens element
Each manufacturing and assembly step is immediately followed by a check
For the production of
aspherical lens elements Leica applies tolerances which cannot exceed 0.03
micrometer or 0.00003mm. To achieve such
precision Leica employs special grinding machines where the lens element is
rotating againt the grinding head, which is in form of a narrow rod. This will grind only a small section of the
entire surface of the lens element at a time.
A special grinding substance is also used which is partially
magnetized. This is done to allow for a
more precise adherence of the grinding substance to the lens and grinding rod
surface. With all lens elements the grinding substance becomes ever finer from one step to the next until it is
mostly water with a small amount of a very fine polishing compound. Unfortunately I was not able to take specific photographs of the manufacture of aspherical lens elements.
All individual lens elements,
spherical and aspherical, do not approach their final surface configuration and
thickness until the lens coating is applied.
Lens coating at Leica is not applied in the same manner for all
elements. Instead selective coating
layers of different substances is applied in a manner that eliminates surface
reflection as much as possible.
Grinding aspherical surfaces
via this method is extremely time consuming.
As with all manufacturing steps at Leica, each individual step is
immediately followed by a check. If
these checks show that deviations from the norm still exist, the step is either
followed by additional work, or the lens element is discarded. This often leads to no more than five
aspherical lens elements being produced in a single day.
To increase lens production,
Leica tried to outsource the manufacture of some aspherical lens elements to
other companies like Schneider Kreuznach, for instance. Unfortunately this proved to be a dead
end. The companies that were approached
by Leica either were not able to work within the specified tolerances or they
simply were not able to supply a sufficient number of elements to make such cooperation
feasible.
Before lenses are assembled, each lens element is coated at the sides with black paint to avoid reflections. This used to be done with a brush, but now a specially designed foam applicator is used instead. The question is often asked why this isn't done by machine. The simple answer is higher accuracy. The general black coating is easily applied with just one step. However the often sharp edge between the polished lens surface and the edge often requires as many of five additional applications to be perfect. This can only be done by hand.
Applying paint to the edges of the lens elements
All of this makes Leica by
far the foremost and most advanced manufacturer of aspherical lens elements in
the world.
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
Inventive Camera Bags for All of Your Gear
For more information on KOMARU and for orders go to: www.taos-photographic.com
For more information and pre orders go to: www.lenstab.com
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
Inventive Camera Bags for All of Your Gear
For more information on KOMARU and for orders go to: www.taos-photographic.com
For more information and pre orders go to: www.lenstab.com
|
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Tom Rogers wrote: Thanks for this; great to see photos too.
ReplyDeleteAlan Starkie wrote: Very interesting - thanks
ReplyDeleteRachid Samkawi wrote: and zeiss?
ReplyDeleteWhat about Zeiss? They used to make lenses and cameras very much the same way Leica does. But now they are farming it all out to other companies.
DeleteI don't want to give the appearance of being anti Zeiss. To the contrary, they are one of the leading optical companies in the world. Their Microscopes for instance can be found in just about any research lab. Surgical microscopes, for instance, are one of their fields of expertise. As a matter of fact, they are the only company that is directly competing with Leica in these areas in terms of quality and performance. I recently visited a professor of biology at his offices at the University of Minnesota. I saw several Microscopes there from Leica as well as Zeiss. When Icommented how surprised I was the see these instruments available to students, he quickly stated that they were only research, that the students had to make due with lesser instruments from other manufacturers. He did mention names, but this is not the place for that. Unfortunately, cameras and lenses are no longer part of the uncompromising quality production at Zeiss any longer.
DeleteCouldn't Leica increase they sales if they were to loosen their tolerances to some degree?
ReplyDeleteOf course. If Leica prices were the same or similar to those of other companies, they sales would certainly increase. But then they would simply join the mass production crow of the camera industry. I am certain that will never happen. I rather see them maintain their quality and performance level.
DeleteOn you pictures I noticed that only few people are working. Couldn't they increase production if they hired more people?
ReplyDeleteThat question was addressed during my visit. The short answer is no. For the lens production Leica uses only very highly trained personnel. Since many of the machines work automatically, they have only one individual working on specific tasks at a time. for instance, when grinding a lens element, the same person will insert the glass blank into the machine to start the grinding process. Once the first step has been completed, including checking for accuracy, the same person then will put the lens element into the next machine to continue the grinding process. while the next machine is running, the same individual has time to put the next glass blank into the first machine. This process continues until the grinding phase of that particular lens element is completed. That of course can give the impression that ther is a lot of down time.
DeleteIsn't Leica going overboard with their production methods and overly tight tolerances? Other manufacturers are making very good camera equipment also. I have never been able to see any differences in the picture quality.
ReplyDeleteIt is necessary to go to the great lengths as Leica does to gain a performance advantage, and that unfortunately is expensive. The gains in performance can not be shown in a computer monitor, their resolution isn't anywhere near enough to do so. Neither do these difference show with relatively small, high resolution prints. However, when very large prints are necessary, or if any given file requires considerable cropping, then, in side by side comparisons, these performance differences will become apparent. Other advantages that are gained is in the lens performance at maximum aperture. This is especially the case with very fast lenses. A good example id the 50mm f/0.95 Noctillux. Even at maximum aperture it will perform as well as many other 50mm lenses when stopped down to f/5.6 or even f/8. In the final analysis, it is up to the individual camera owner to determine if the extra cost of a Leica is worth the performance gains.
DeleteThat's what Germans do. Witness a Mercedes Benz car. A marvel of engineering, but never even close to being a top reliable car.
DeleteWhat exactly is it that "German do"? What you post is an opinion, or do you have any proof to back up your claim?
DeleteThank you Heinz, this is fascinating information. Will you be posting about assembly? Regarding production standards, Leica's unique standing in the photographic community is exemplary, to regard high standards above the bottom line takes very special people that should be given the rightful recognition they deserve.
ReplyDeleteI had hoped to be able to gain the same insight with Leica's camera production as I did with their lenses. Unfortunately that wasn't possible because of the new camera or cameras that will be introduced at "Das Wesent;iche" on October 20. There is a huge window which normally allows a great overview of the camera assembly. This was covered by a huge poster with a picture of what this usually looks like. It carried a note indication that they were working on new items. All questions regarding the new equipment were met with a polite smile, but nothing more. Of course I couldn't take any pictures. I do have some data for the camera tolerances which I mentioned in the above article already, but nothing beyond that. I have been in contact with Mr. Elbert Roland to obtain additional information and possibly some pictures. As soon as I have gathered enough material for an article, I will write and publish it.
ReplyDeleteCorrections needed for some of your numbers;
ReplyDelete1 micron = 1e-6 meters while 1 millimeter = 1e-3 meters, so "minimum of 1/100 mm or 1 micron" needs correcting.
Further down you should be referring to "thou" not microns; eg
"cannot exceed 0.003 microns or 0.000075mm" should be 0.003 thousands of an inch or 0.000075mm (or 0.0000762 to be precise)
Thanks for pointing out the mistakes regarding some of the measurements in the article. I have corrected them.
Delete