By Heinz Richter
Should I upgrade from an M8 to an M9? I see this question asked quite frequently. The M9, as the follow up model of the M8, certainly must be considered an improvement with its full frame sensor and 18 megapixels, compared to the APS sized, 10 megapixel sensor of the M8.
Should I upgrade from an M8 to an M9? I see this question asked quite frequently. The M9, as the follow up model of the M8, certainly must be considered an improvement with its full frame sensor and 18 megapixels, compared to the APS sized, 10 megapixel sensor of the M8.
This switch is quite often
recommended and in many cases it appears to be also based on the still prevailing
idea that CCD sensors are superior to the now common CMOS sensors. That issue
was thoroughly debunked with a comparison test by David Farkas of Leica Store
Miami. (see "THE GREAT DEBATE: CCD VS. CMOS")
Leica M8 with 35mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH
Leica M9 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH
My first digital M Leica
was a Leica M8 and it worked better than expected. The smaller sensor and the relatively low
resolution of 10 megapixels had much less of an affect than expected.
What bothered me the most
is the crop factor of the smaller sensor. I grew up with 35mm cameras and have gotten used
to the effects of certain focal length in relation to the image. With the smaller sensor this no longer
applied and I found myself forever calculating what any focal length on the M8
would translate to on a full frame camera. Of course this is
something one can get used to, but 40+ years of experience with film didn’t make
that any easier.
But there was more. When using my film Leicas, I often used
lenses beyond the standard, rangefinder coupled lenses. I did close-up work as well as using lenses
longer than 135mm. This made the
Visoflex an important part of my camera outfit.
Leica M5, Visoflex III, Leica Bellows II, 560mm f/6.8 Telyt
Photograph taken with the above combination
Of course the Visoflex can
be used on the Leica M8 and M9, but I had always hoped for a more elegant
solution. The Visoflex definitely adds a
considerable amount of bulk and it takes up a fair amount of space during transport. Subsequently I was hesitant to go with the M9
and I am glad I waited.
Leica M240 with 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH
The introduction of the
Leica M240 was the answer for me. Full
frame, an even higher resolution of 24 megapixels and a CMOS sensor, offering
live view. This allowed me to do close
ups and the use of long lenses without any additional accessories, using the
screen in back of the camera. Of course
that soon proved to be less than ideal.
But the solution of that problem lay in the electronic Visoflex. Added to the accessory shoe, I now had a well
working viewfinder that easily allowed focusing for close up work as well as long lenses.
Leica M240 with attached electronic Visoflex
Granted, using the
electronic Visoflex is not as nice as an optical viewfinder, but I don’t let
that bother me. Focusing is quite
accurate, especially with focus peaking, and the slight delay in the image
refresh when moving the camera is negligible to me. My first digital Leica was a Digilux 2 and its
electronic finder is light years behind in comparison. I got used to it and subsequently had no problem
at all with the electronic Visoflex.
The M 240 also has the advantage of electronically illuminated viewfinder frames. This makes it independent of the relative ambient brightness which illuminated all previous Leica M models. Under adverse lighting conditions this sometimes made it difficult to see the viewfinder frames.
But I discovered another
advantage of the M240 over the M9 and especially the M8. Since no zoom lenses are available for Leica
M cameras, we are forced to change lenses quite often out of necessity. With the higher resolution of the M240 I
found that I have been able to curtail that need to quite an extend. For most of the work I do, 24 megapixels is
more than enough. I rarely make very big
enlargements and therefore was actually quite happy with the M8. However, with virtually all of the Leica
lenses we have a performance potential that is often not being taken advantage
of.
I am talking about cropping. I found that using a shorter lens, in my case
often a 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit or a 50mm f/2 Summicron, I can shoot and crop to the
field of view of a longer lens to quite an extend without sacrificing overall
quality of the image. In many cases this
has allowed me to get a shot that I otherwise might have missed while changing
lenses.
Leica M240 with 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit, full frame
Same frame cropped
Extreme crop of the same frame
Leica M240 with Novoflex 200mm f/3.8, full frame
Same frame cropped
Same frame cropped for small detail
Same frame cropped for small detail
Since I bought the M240, Leica has presented us with the M10. Is it worth to change to it? Not for me. Of course the M10 has several advantages. For one thing it is smaller, having gone back to the dimensions of the Leica M film cameras and there are several operational improvements. But to me that is not enough to justify the expense. The larger size of the M240 has never bothered me. I was even happy using the huge Zeiss Contarex years ago.
One other advantage of the M10 lies in its better high ISO capabilities. It definitely display less noise in such situations. However, since I rarely use images straight out of the camera, this is less of a problem for me. I always optimize my images in post production, including noise reduction with the help of Photoshop when necessary.
Does that mean the M 240
is the end of the road for me? Well, I’ll
have to see. Rumors are of an additional M10 model, supposedly with a sensor of over 40 megapixel. I
would consider it for its even greater cropping capabilities. Until then, the M240 is an ideal camera for
me. Of course your mileage might vary.
For other articles on this blog please click on Blog Archive in the column to the right
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
_______________________________________________________________________
For other articles on this blog please click on Blog Archive in the column to the right
To comment or to read comments please scroll past the ads below.
All ads present items of interest to Leica owners.
_______________________________________________________________________
Buy vintage Leica cameras from
America's premier Leica specialist
Buy vintage Leica cameras from
America's premier Leica specialist
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Click on image to enlarge
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
Heinz, I more or less agree with your article. I had 3 M10 camera bodies, and although the IQ at high ISO is outstanding, the camera body is very sexy slim, I have no further interest anymore in this version.
ReplyDeleteWhy?
Well, ......
Out of the 3 M10's I owned, all 3 failed and had to go back to the Wetzlar factory for repair. This all happened during the first few weeks.
So the M10 book is closed for me.
I bought a new M-E 240 this week, and it arrived yesterday.
It is the best looking M I ever had I must say.
The grey paint is very good looking, in reality much better then on the internet pics.
So with the nearly unexhaustive battery, this M240 is allI want.
Concerning the colors, I must say that I like them a lot.
IMO the best of all M's, even better then the M8 and M9!
I am not a CCD fanboy, and I must say that I do not see the differences between CCD and CMOS.
Many others confirm this to me, even very well photographers have the same opinion, e.g. Rui Palha.......
A few friends of me skipped the M240 because they did not like it. So it is a also a matter of personal taste.
Great article!
I am sorry to hear about your bad experience with the M10. Fortunately, any such experience has so far eluded me with any Leica I have ever owned. As I mentioned in the article, the CMOS sensors are definitely not inferior to any CCD and the advantages like life view, higher ISO capability etc. ultimately make them the better choice. Camera choices as well as the choice of which Leica to own ultimately depends on the individual, and with Leica we have the additional advantage of a camera system that offers lenses, unsurpassed by anyone else. Those lenses, coupled with cameras designed to optimize their performance potential still makes Leica the best choice - for me.
DeleteI own the M9 based first generation M Monochrom and the M240 based M-D 262. I see no reason for a newer replacement for either of these except possibly moving from the old Monochrom to the not-quite-as old M246, and that only for the bigger battery and illuminated frames as I shoot a lot in low light.
ReplyDelete