It is not often that we have
a chance to rewrite history. This is one
of those instances where it is possible to do so, not by some revisionist
scheme, but with new facts, previously unknown.
What I am referring to is the history of the Ur-Leica. A lot of what we know about the camera is
actually false. I have written about
this topic on several occasions on this blog, and I, like so many, have been
misled by the published findings of others.
We do know the account of the
events that led to the development of the initial prototype of the Leica, the
Ur-Leica. However, there seems to some
misinformation that claims that Barnack's Ur-Leica, the original prototype, was
initially built as an exposure testing device.
This confusion stems from the fact that Barnack, shortly after he came
to Leitz in 1910, was given the task to build a motion picture camera (see: http://gmpphoto.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-leica-before-first-leica.html). Since no light meters were available at that
time, Barnack did indeed build a small exposure test camera that held just a
few frames of motion picture film. It
were the rather good results obtained from this camera that convinced him to
give 35mm film photography a try, to build the Ur-Leica. I stand by my assertion that this camera was
not the exposure testing device that Barnack made (see: HOW THE LEICA CAME TO
BE http://gmpphoto.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-leica-came-to-be.html).
It is with the many accounts
of what happened after the development of the Ur-Leica that a lot of
misinformation has been brought forth.
In spite of all the published
information about a second Ur-Leica, there is and always has been only one
example. The account given by Gianni
Rogliatti for instance, that claims that the original Ur-Leica was given by
Oscar Barnack to Ernst Leitz II, and that he used a second version for himself
is inaccurate. Also inaccurate is Rogliatti’s
claim that this camera had been in the possession of the Deutsches Museum in
Munich and was later returned to Oskar Barnack’s son Konrad, who supposedly
later sold the camera to a collector in the US.
Leica Prototype or Ur-Leica
It is correct that Konrad
Barnack did have a Leica camera that was at the Deutsches Museum for a while,
and it is correct that this camera was later sold by him to a collector, but
this camera was one of the preproduction, Null Serie (0-series) models made by
Leitz prior to the decision to manufacture and market the Leica. This camera was the 0-series camera #105.
Rolf Fricke, one of the
foremost experts of the Leica and cofounder of LHSA, the Leica Historical
Society of America, now called the International Leica Society, wrote the
following:
“The camera that was at the Deutsches Museum was not
an Ur-Leica!!! It was 0-Series (or
Null-Serie) camera No.105, which Konrad Barnack requested back from that museum
and subsequently sold to Jim Forsyth of Florida. Many years later, Prof. Al
Clarke of Columbus, OH and I bought out that collector, and Al kept No.105,
which he later sold to another prominent collector, and Al also kept the large
format camera that Oskar Barnack had used during his hikes in the woods, and
which he found cumbersome and which motivated him to work on a smaller, handier
camera, which led to the Ur-Leica. There is no solid proof whatsoever that
there ever was a second Ur-Leica. References to a second Ur-Leica are always
couched in the words "alleged", or "said to be", and this
eventually creeps into the stories of superficial historians! The camera that
Ernst Leitz took along on his visit to New York was the original and only
Ur-Leica!”
Over the years Rolf has had a
rather personal connection to Leica, much beyond anyone outside of the
company. He explains that he bought his
first Leica, a used model IIIc on February 21, 1949. In Rio De Janeiro, where
he grew up.
“I still have that camera and the instruction booklet
in Portuguese, the camera is still functional!
Next I very naively went to the local Leitz
representative, where a kind elderly gentleman (Paul Louis Toinndorf) explained
to me that the distributor does not handle retail matters, which are the
responsibility of the dealers, but he invited me in anyway and patiently
demonstrated to me what one can do with a Leica, like using a wide-angle lens,
a long focus lens, a close-up attachment, etc, none of which I could even
remotely afford.
He even very graciously offered to lend me such accessories,
all of which endeared the man and his firm to me. Much, much later I learned
that he had completed his apprenticeship at Leitz in the Hausertorwerk
building, the very building where Oskar Barnack had his office, and he had met
that legendary man in person! That warm treatment endeared the camera to me and
created a loyalty that led to further acquaintances, all the way to the Leitz
brothers and sister themselves, and even repeated stays at the Leitz villa Haus
Friedwart.”
A while ago I wrote about the
possibility that I came across a picture of what might be the second
Ur-Leica. It is a picture of a camera
that obviously is of the same design as the known Ur-Leica, but it is outwardly
different. I obtained this picture from
the Deutsches Museum in Munich. I
contacted the museum to shed some more light on this issue. I corresponded with Frau Dr. Cornelia Kemp,
curator for photo and film at the museum.
She wrote about the camera that used to be owned by Konrad Barnack:
Picture of the Ur-Leica from
the Deutsches Museum in Munich
“Bei der Leica handelt es sich nicht um die Ur-Leica,
sondern um die Nr. 105 aus der Nullserie, die ab 1923 hergestellt wurde. Sie
gehörte aber nie dem Museum, sondern war ihm von Oskar Barnacks Sohn Conrad von
1939-45 leihweise zur Verfügung
gestellt.”
(The Leica is not the Ur-Leica, but the No. 105 from
the pilot series (0-series) that was produced from 1923. It never belonged to
the museum, it was given on loan by Oskar Barnack's son Conrad from 1939-45)
Leica 0-Series Camera with
optical viewfinder
Leica 0-Series Camera with
folding viewfinder
Dr. Kemp went on to explain
the picture the museum had sent to me:
“Am 30. 9. 1940 bat der Museumskonservator Theodor
Konzelmann Conrad Barnack um Bildmaterial für einen Vortrag. Unter dem übersandten und am 30. 10. 1940
zurückerstatteten Bildmaterial befand sich auch ein Leica Dia welches die
Ur-Leica darstellt. Ganz offensichtlich
versäumte das Museum nicht , von dem Dia eine Kopie zu ziehen.”
(On 9. 30. 1940 Theodor Konzelmann, the curator of the
museum, asked Conrad Barnack for some photographic material for a lecture.
Among the material sent on 10. 30. 1940 was also a Leica slide of the Ur-Leica.
Obviously the museum did not miss out on making a copy of the slide)
This, however, does not
explain the differences between the camera on the picture from the Deutsches
Museum and the known Ur-Leica that is in possession of Leica Camera AG. Considering that the picture was taken in
1940 or even earlier, it stands to reason that the differences, which are
mostly cosmetic, occurred during the time after the picture was taken,
especially if one considers that until relatively recently, the camera was
handled quite often in a rather cavalier manner.
Rolf Fricke made the
following comment:
“The one and only Ur-Leica (by definition, it would
not be an 'Ur-Leica' if there was more than one!) traveled around for quite a
bit after the Museum picture was taken in 1940. For example, the former Leitz
CEO Alfred Loew brought it to Rochester, NY in conjunction with a presentation
he gave at a Photo History Symposium at George Eastman House way back in the
1970s, for which I organized the program. He left the camera with me for a week
while he went to Washington, DC on business and retrieved it on his way
back. Nowadays that camera is highly
insured and it is treated with significantly greater caution and security.”
I can certainly confirm the
relatively careless treatment of the camera from personal experience because I
had the opportunity to handle the camera on two occasions during annual
meetings of the Leica Historical Society.
Once it had been brought by Rolf Fricke and another time by Dr.
Wangorsch, then the curator of the Leica Museum in Wetzlar.
We do know of the existence
of another prototype of the Leica, the so-called third prototype. It is a camera visibly different from the Ur
Leica and it is always shown without a lens. However, there is what should be considered a
third prototype which is relatively unknown.
So called Prototype 3
This camera is thoroughly
described in the Book “Barnacks Erste Leica” (Barnack’s First Leica), written
by Dr. Günter Kisselbach. I did get
permission from Dr. Kisselbach to use some of the pictures from the book. Since I have not yet been able to obtain
this book, I am using a description by Rolf Fricke:
“There is a large, very well-illustrated book by the
very personable Dr. Günter Kisselbach, an ear-nose-and-throat doctor in
Wetzlar, who is the younger son of Theo Kisselbach, the erstwhile director of
the original "Leica Schule".
Guenther's older brother Wolfgang Kisselbach is the overall manager of
the construction of the brand new purpose-built factory buildings and museum in
Leitz Park in Wetzlar.
The book is entitled "BARNACKS ERSTE LEICA"
(= Barnack's first Leica"), and it features a camera in great detail that
is very similar to the 0-series camera with the same optical finder, except
that it is all brass with brown leather covering and has a different flat dial
between the viewfinder and the rewind knob for setting the slit width (in mm)
of the focal plane shutter. Evidently Kisselbach the father kept that camera
when he retired and Kisselbach the younger inherited it, and he thoroughly
studied it and had it disassembled and adapted for picture taking by expert
repairman Ottmar Michaeli (who was one of my speakers at one of the LHSA Annual
Meetings!), all of which is beautifully illustrated in the aforementioned book.
By "First Leica", Günter Kisselbach means
Barnack's first practical camera (still not named 'Leica'!) after the Ur-Leica.
On page 187 of that outstanding book there is a photo of "Prototyp
Nr.3" in what is left of the Leica museum, which was plundered for sales
when the company was about to go bankrupt. That camera has no lens mount, a
folding, recessed open frame viewfinder frame on top and an exposure counter on
the front of the camera. There is no rewind knob, and the accessory shoe is
located where that knob would be.”
Barnacks Handmuster (Sample)
Top of 0-Series Leica for
comparison
Since this camera is so very
close to the 0-series cameras, one must assume that the so-called prototype Nr.
3 was made prior to it and I feel it is not wrong to refer to it as the second
(not third) prototype. However, since no
date for this camera has ever been established, this is simply conjecture on my
part. What I can say with certainty at
this point is that only one Ur-Leica was made by Oskar Barnack and that two
other prototypes exist from the time prior to the 0-series cameras.
If by chance I dig up any
other interesting facts about the history of the Leica, I will report about it
here.
For more information on
Barnacks Handmuster (Sample) camera go to:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For high quality camera bags and accessories worthy of Leica equipment, go to
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/affiliates-validated.aspx?type=affiliate
CURRENT SPECIAL OFFERS AND DISCOUNTS
*******************************************************************************
Order: info@gmpphoto.com
Please make payment via PayPal to GMP Photography
No comments:
Post a Comment